|
royalsteven (September 6, 2008 at 11:56 am)
He's so true when he says 'I don't know any great masters of digital photography'. Although digital photography is a relevant and logical devlopment of photography it isn't near as artistic or valuebale then the old analogue photography. Photography with telephone? Please.
commonlanguage (July 11, 2008 at 2:13 am)
A brilliant photographer, brilliant. No one anymore is doing or seeing what he does. He is a link to a style and philosophy of photography that is real and valuable. Ralph becomes more valuable as the years pass. Watch his physical reaction when he mentions Weston as an influence. Perhaps the greatest of all, he knows the debt we all have. Peace.
newyorkernut3 (July 6, 2008 at 10:42 pm)
A big ego who is so into himself over the yearsit gets just worse and worse ,in any event his bank account matches his ego from fools thatcollect this simplistic work.As a publisher of other greater photogs he was much better but that was the last time this ham was doing anything other than his own spiel.If you tell people you are great some will believe you.He really was influenced by some of theguys and gals he published but would notacknowledge that,even on his deathbed.
theoneenlightened (June 2, 2008 at 7:42 pm)
Could you explain how he is great and what he has actually accomplished. The discipline of photography will never have a master, because there is nothing to master, transcend, graduate, ... . Painting, on the other hand, does. I'm claiming to be the first and only master of the discipline of painting, who transcended the object, graduated the subject, ... . Cheers!!!
lomofatboy (March 21, 2008 at 1:56 am)
Great man |
